Pioneer Pancake Box Receipes

The comissions, or the danger of running into an artist presentable. UPDATED! Notes

in this forum of Cool Bleeding can be found one of those stories comissions that makes you spend all of a sudden the urge to order one, which is terrible news for all those authors who can not get professional engagements and live in them.

How could it be otherwise, the artist in question is Sienkiewicz, an author of whom no doubt of her artistry, but as a person leaves a lot to be desired.

On the story behind the picture, basically just a fan who pays $ 100 at a convention in 2007 to do a sketch of a creature of his creation, no matter what.

But two years later, your e-mails begin to be returned. Argue their case publicly and Sienkiewicz comes in contact with him to try to resolve the issue. 18 months later meets Bill at a convention, reminding the matter and gives you the happy final Comissiona at the same convention.

Thus, scathing comments, the picture appears to correspond more or less the commission. But if you look at the picture below, we will notice the subliminal message that contains (Concentrate on the parts that are not blurred). No comments ...

Incidentally, I recommend to art aficionados who Sienkiewicz start preparing a trip to Granada Hall 2011 to be held from 10 to 13 March. And here I can tell ...

UPDATE 13/2/2011: I warn Adolfo Rodriguez that the story did not end there. In this other thread , expanded customer history.

In short, it seems that when Sienkiewicz learned that he had made public in the previous thread, I immediately called and were arguing heatedly on the subject. Sienkiewicz said he had not drawn a penis and intentionally concealed that he was surprised that thought that.

seems that a meal of Thanksgiving Day some friends asked him about the issue and berated him. Again refused to draw the hidden penis. When those friends showed him the picture with some of faded, he had no choice but to admit that, indeed, it seemed. He said he did not have to be there, but he understood perfectly that people will interpret it as an insult. Later

Sienkiewicz sketch he made a second, as to what the customer asked, and this time he was satisfied (you can see it down, which is a reinterpretation of the cover of Crime SuspenStories No. 22).

personal level, I have the feeling that the subject got out of his hands and tried to correct it as he could, but I'm absolutely convinced he did it on purpose, like he did in his time Michael Golden. It seems that after all the media pressure is good for something, which is good news to keep out those unpresentable authors and do not have the sense of total impunity.